Carter v. State
Carter v. State
425 So. 2d 633; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27756
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Carter v. State
Opinion of the Court
We remand to strike from the order of probation revocation the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay supervision costs. The state failed to present evidence establishing appellant’s ability to pay. Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We, however, affirm the revocation order and judgment based on the trial court’s findings that appellant: (1) failed to submit monthly reports; (2) changed his residence without consent; and (3) was charged by information with burglary and armed robbery.
REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.