Schwartz v. Schwartz
Schwartz v. Schwartz
427 So. 2d 232; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20252
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
Opinion of the Court
The amount of permanent periodic alimony is excessive in the light of the evidence concerning the husband’s ability to pay, Parham v. Parham, 385 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); the cause is therefore remanded solely for the trial court to determine a reasonable, substantially lower award. The judgment under review is otherwise entirely affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.