Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Estate of Engskow v. Cullen

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 28, 1983 · No. 82-489 · Dell, Hurley, Purdy

428 So. 2d 388 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Harrisson v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COMMISSION (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly found that appellant failed to present competent substantial evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty, an essential element of appellant’s affirmative defenses to ejectment of boundary by agreement or boundary by acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Brooks v. Fletcher, 393 So.2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); and Seddon v. Edmondson, 411 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment of ejectment.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY and DELL, JJ„ and H. MARK PURDY, Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.