Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Dixon v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 10, 1983 · Booth, Mills, Shivers

432 So. 2d 779; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20514 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Williams v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Dixon appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

Dixon argues that since only his co-felon carried a rifle, he should not have been convicted of armed robbery. Vicarious possession is sufficient to sustain the conviction, Hillman v. State, 410 So.2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). He further argues that he should not have received a three-year mandatory minimum. The record is clear that he did not.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.