Dixon v. State
Dixon v. State
432 So. 2d 779; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20514
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dixon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Dixon appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.
Dixon argues that since only his co-felon carried a rifle, he should not have been convicted of armed robbery. Vicarious possession is sufficient to sustain the conviction, Hillman v. State, 410 So.2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). He further argues that he should not have received a three-year mandatory minimum. The record is clear that he did not.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.