Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.

Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 21, 1983 · Barkdull, Ferguson, Jorgenson
433 So. 2d 50; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20271 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Concreform Systems, Inc. v. R.M. Hicks Construction Co.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The resolution of factual conflicts by a trial judge in a nonjury case will not be set aside on review unless totally unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Green v. Hartley Realty Corp., 416 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). There is substantial record evidence, although conflicting, to support the findings on both the complaint and the counterclaim.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.