Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Lattimore v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 21, 1983 · Ferguson, Nesbitt, Schwartz

433 So. 2d 56; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20275 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pope v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We vacate two of the three bases upon which defendant was found in violation of his probation because the state failed to demonstrate at the hearing: (a) that the defendant had willfully and not without fault failed to maintain employment, Chatman v. State, 365 So.2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); and (b) that he had the financial ability to pay for the cost of his probationary supervision, Smith v. State, 373 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). In all other respects, the order of revocation of probation and entry of judgment and sentence thereon are affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.