Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 21, 1983 · No. 82-2349 · Bark, Dull, Nesbitt, Schwartz

433 So. 2d 59 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. Holman (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is an implied warranty that a product will be suitable for the purpose for which it is purchased. When the evidence *60discloses that this is not the case, the purchaser has a right to recover his damages occasioned by the use of the product. Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla. 1972); In Be Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Smith v. Burdine’s Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); Medlin v. Rucks, 397 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Chrysler Corporation v. Miller, 310 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Arcade Steam Laundry v. Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section 672.315 Florida Statutes (1977).

The final judgment here under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.