Dilliplane v. State
Dilliplane v. State
433 So. 2d 1027; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20227
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s convictions for burglary and grand theft are affirmed, without prejudice to any issue of ineffective assistance of counsel which may be raised by a motion for post-conviction relief. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.