Roth v. State
Roth v. State
435 So. 2d 274; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21716
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Roth v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s 3.850 motion on the ground that it is insufficient to support a claim for the relief prayed for. See Ables v. State, 404 So.2d 137 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Clements v. State, 340 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.