Alfrey v. State
Alfrey v. State
435 So. 2d 971; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22400
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Alfrey v. State
Opinion of the Court
During the hearing on appellant’s motions to suppress and to dismiss, his counsel stipulated that the issues were dispositive and that he would not need a jury. The state argues that by these actions appellant’s counsel waived appellant’s right to a speedy trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. We disagree. See State v. Ansley, 349 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge appellant.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.