Lobel v. Southgate Condominium Ass'n
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- CAMERON ANDREW GARROW AND KENNETH JOSEPH GARROW v. ANN MARIE ANTONIETTA AND JAMES ANTONIETTA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
- H GREG AUTO POMPANO, INC. v. WILLIAM RASKIN (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
- H GREG AUTO POMPANO, INC. v. WILLIAM RASKIN (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
- Northern Chamber Development Co. v. Weaver (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case is per curiam affirmed. However, we pause to comment on the motion for attorneys fees, made by the successful appellee, which we deny.
Increasingly we note a tendency to seek attorneys fees out of season. The Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b) calls for the filing of such a motion no later than the time for service of the reply brief. In the case now before us the reply brief was filed on November 8, 1982 and it was not until over five months later that the motion for fees was filed. It is because of this tardiness that we have denied it.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.