Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Veri v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Veri v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 12, 1983 · Joanos, Wigginton, Zehmer
436 So. 2d 348; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20127 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Veri v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Veri appeals the Parole and Probation Commission’s determination of his presumptive parole release date. We affirm. Veri was timely interviewed within six months of his confinement in execution of judgment, Section 947.16(1), Florida Statutes, and was interviewed under the applicable guidelines in effect at the time of the interview; Veri’s ex post facto argument is without merit. May v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 424 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), aff’d, 435 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1983); Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.