Feldman v. Farber
Feldman v. Farber
438 So. 2d 202; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24325
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Feldman v. Farber
Opinion of the Court
Based on appellee’s confession of error, that an injunction is not a proper remedy in an action at law where monetary damages will adequately compensate, Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Digaeteno v. Perotti, 374 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we reverse and remand.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.