Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Hilsman v. Hilsman

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 14, 1983 · Anstead, Hurley, John, Sel, Wes

438 So. 2d 880; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24476 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Angle v. Angle (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Based on the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980), we affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for the provision which requires the former husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of each child “during the child’s minority and through college.” (Emphasis supplied). On remand, we direct the trial court to delete the phrase, “and through college.” See Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Kern v. Kern, 360 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.