Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Maddox v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 5, 1983 · Grimes, Lehan, Schoonover

438 So. 2d 959; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22393 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Llida v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Famiglietti v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Emshwiller v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of thirty years for attempted murder and robbery and a concurrent term of five years for grand theft. The court retained jurisdiction over the first half of both thirty-year sentences.1 Section 947.-16(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982), provides that when an individual is convicted of two or more felonies and concurrent sentences are imposed, jurisdiction of the trial court shall apply only to the first half of the maximum sentence imposed for the highest felony charged and proven. Accordingly, this cause is remanded with instructions that the court strike the reservation of jurisdiction from one of the thirty-year sentences. Otherwise, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

. While section 947.16(3) does not contemplate the retention of jurisdiction over a sentence for attempted murder, as such, see Crotzer v. State, 425 So.2d 159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), the reservation here was appropriate under that portion of the statute which refers to the commission of any felony involving the use of a firearm or other deadly weapon.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.