Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia

C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 31, 1983 · Booth, Smith, Wigginton
439 So. 2d 1016; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.