C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia

Florida District Courts of Appeal
C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia, 439 So. 2d 1016 (1983)
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23552
Booth, Smith, Wigginton

C & N Service Corp. v. Garzia

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla. 1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
C & N SERVICE CORPORATION and Florida Insurance Guaranty Association v. John GARZIA and Division of Workers' Compensation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published