Tindall v. State
Tindall v. State
441 So. 2d 677; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22688
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Tindall v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant raises five points on appeal which we find to be without merit, and we, therefore, affirm his convictions and sentence.
We note, however, that the jury verdict finds appellant guilty of a first degree felony, and he was sentenced according to a first degree felony, but the judgment reflects a second degree felony. We conclude that the error in the judgment probably constitutes a typographical error and, therefore, remand for the trial court to conform the verdict, judgment and sentence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.