Freiman v. Hirsch

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Freiman v. Hirsch, 441 So. 2d 1146 (1983)
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24242
Bark, Dull, Jorgenson, Schwartz

Freiman v. Hirsch

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Marvin A.H. FREIMAN v. Jay HIRSCH
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published