Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See Hitchcock v. State, 432 So.2d 42 (Fla. 1983); Palmes v. State, 425 So.2d 4 (Fla. 1983); Raulerson v. State, 420 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1982).