Carter v. Garcia-Pedrosa

Florida District Courts of Appeal November 29, 1983

Carter v. Garcia-Pedrosa, 442 So. 2d 1022 (1983)

1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24417

Barkdull, Ferguson, Jorgenson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an assistant city attorney, was an unclassified employee under the City’s Civil Service Rules. Appellee, the City Attorney, was not required to show good cause at an administrative hearing before revoking her appointment. Section 62(1), City of Miami Charter.1

Affirmed.

. Section 62(1)' of the Charter provides in part: The civil service of the city is hereby divided into the unclassified and the classified service.

(1) The unclassified service shall include:

(d) All attorneys employed by the city. The city attorney shall be the supervisor of all attorneys employed by the city. The city attorney shall have exclusive authority regarding, but not limited to appointment, removal and salary as to assistant city attorneys.

Reference

Full Case Name: Mikele CARTER v. Jose R. GARCIA-PEDROSA and City of Miami
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published