Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Wallace v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Wallace v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 7, 1983 · Glickstein, Goldman, Murray, Walden
442 So. 2d 1029; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25054 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wallace v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALDEN, J., and GOLDMAN, MURRAY, Associate Judge, concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

GLICKSTEIN, Judge,

concurring specially:

I concur in the result, affirming the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict, although it was done for the wrong reason. Had appellant established liability, he would have been entitled to nominal damages. See Muroff v. Dill, 386 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 392 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 1981). However, he failed to make a prima facie case of liability. The trial judge directed the verdict, finding a prima facie case of liability but also finding a failure to properly establish damages.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.