Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Shaw v. State

Shaw v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 28, 1983 · Campbell, Hobson, Ryder
443 So. 2d 342; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25354 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Shaw v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Shaw appeals a judgment and sentence rendered following an order denying his motion to discharge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.

Shaw’s attorney filed an Anders brief.1 Upon notification of this fact, Shaw filed a pro se brief. After an independent examination of the record and the law, we find no merit to this appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). -•

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑