Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Osterink v. Moon

Osterink v. Moon
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 30, 1983 · Danahy, Han, Ryder
443 So. 2d 388; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25345 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Osterink v. Moon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Finding support in the record for the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between the parties, we affirm that decision. We also affirm the trial court’s requirement of the return to the purchaser of his deposit money, plus expenses, and the denial of interest and attorney’s fees. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling that Hixon was not bound by the trust agreement.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.