Osterink v. Moon
Osterink v. Moon
443 So. 2d 388; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25345
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Osterink v. Moon
Opinion of the Court
Finding support in the record for the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between the parties, we affirm that decision. We also affirm the trial court’s requirement of the return to the purchaser of his deposit money, plus expenses, and the denial of interest and attorney’s fees. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling that Hixon was not bound by the trust agreement.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.