Osterink v. Moon
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Osterink v. Moon, 443 So. 2d 388 (1983)
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25345
Danahy, Han, Ryder
Osterink v. Moon
Opinion of the Court
Finding support in the record for the trial court’s ruling that no contract existed between the parties, we affirm that decision. We also affirm the trial court’s requirement of the return to the purchaser of his deposit money, plus expenses, and the denial of interest and attorney’s fees. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling that Hixon was not bound by the trust agreement.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Leonard J. OSTERINK, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. Jack R. MOON, trustee and individually, Barnett Bank of Naples, trustee, Patent Concern, N.V., a foreign corporation, William E. Townsend, Walter R. Rogers, William T. Barrett, Jr., Robert T. Benson, Jr., J. Thad Moss, William H. Buchannan, III, Benny Ruth Goodman, and Walter Rogers, Appellees/Cross-Appellants v. LEE COUNTY BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as trustee under the will of William Day Hixon, Mary Jo Hixon, and Flagship National Bank of Miami, as personal representative of the Estate of William Day Hixon
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published