Glickman v. Potamkin
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Roberts v. Benson (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 2023)
- Lipsig v. Ramlawi (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Kimberly Grippa v. Ronald Rubin (11th Cir. 2025)
- JAMES W. YOUNG, JR. v. MARY STRUNK KOPCHAK (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
- Bobcat North America, LLC v. Inland Waste Holdings, LLC (Superior Court of Delaware 2019)
- Palmer v. Gotta Have It Golf Collectibles, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2000)
- Knepper v. Genstar Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- McCurdy v. Collis (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
- Schreidell v. Shoter (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
- Kuczkir v. Martell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Bob GLICKMAN a/K/a Bob Glick, Appellant,
v.
Alan POTAMKIN, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*613 Frederick C. Sake, Miami, for appellant.
Paige & Catlin and William M. Tuttle, II, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
BASKIN, Judge.
In a defamation action, the affirmative defenses of truth, good motive and qualified privilege present factual questions for resolution by the jury. See Curtis Publishing Co. v. Fraser, 209 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1954); Lewis v. Evans, 406 So.2d 489 (Fla.2d DCA 1981); Drennen v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 328 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Because appellant asserted these defenses, we find that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966).
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.