Harnick v. Harnick
Harnick v. Harnick
444 So. 2d 87; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Harnick v. Harnick
Opinion of the Court
A presumption of undue influence did not arise where the daughter, beneficiary of inter-vivos gifts and beneficiary under a will, although occupying a confidential relationship with the testator, was not shown to have actively procured the will or the gifts. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971); In re Estate of Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.