Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Hudson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 8, 1984 · Anstead, Glickstein, Walden

444 So. 2d 598; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Crowell v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or *599bad character, even though such evidence points to commission of another crime. Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1981); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1959); Section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1982). Our review of the record also reveals that the State did in fact establish ownership and identity of the stolen property by competent, substantial evidence. Johnson v. State, 353 So.2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). See also, State v. Fort, 380 So.2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.