Layton v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Layton v. State, 444 So. 2d 1102 (1984)
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11500
Boardman, Hobson, Ryder

Layton v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has been given an opportunity to file a supplemental brief in proper person but has chosen not to respond. Accordingly, having reviewed both the Anders brief filed by the public defender and the record on appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to the judgment and sentence. “However, because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court, that portion of the court’s order requiring the appellant to pay court costs and to make payments to the Victim’s Crime Compensation Fund is stricken.” Music v. State, 429 So.2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); see also Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Affirmed as modified.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard Thomas LAYTON v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published