Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Bridges v. State

Bridges v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 25, 1984 · Glickstein, Goldman, Murray, Walden
445 So. 2d 596; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11466 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bridges v. State

Opinion of the Court

UPON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We initially affirmed Per Curiam, 444 So.2d 425, the convictions of appellant, Brian Scott Bridges, without opinion. One of the appellate grounds asserted was the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. We abide by our earlier affirmance. However, said affirmance shall be without prej*597udice to the right of appellant to present his allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel to the trial court via Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Except for the foregoing, the Petition for Rehearing is

DENIED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., and GOLDMAN, MURRAY, Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑