Ricco v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Ricco v. State, 445 So. 2d 627 (1984)
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11643
Anstead, Hurley, Walden

Ricco v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Alfred W. RICCO v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published