Seymour v. Harris
Seymour v. Harris
445 So. 2d 662; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12006
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Seymour v. Harris
Opinion of the Court
The trial judge did not err in finding that the option agreement was extended by the appellee’s tender to appellant of the sums required under the terms of the agreement. And although we might have afforded the appellee relief different from that provided for in the final judgment, we cannot say that the equitable relief fashioned by the trial court in this specific performance case constituted an abuse of discretion. We find no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.