Peterson v. Peterson
Peterson v. Peterson
445 So. 2d 673; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11911
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lampkin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Peterson v. Peterson, 431 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Concurring Opinion
(concurring).
By this affirmance we do not decide whether appellant will be estopped to seek, by separate action, reimbursement for cost of improvements made to the realty during the period of his life estate — an issue which was not before the court in the trial of this action.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.