Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co., 445 So. 2d 1055 (1984)
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730
Baskin, Genson, Hendry, Jor
Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
Opinion of the Court
Treating appellants’ challenge to the trial court’s Order denying a motion to dissolve notice of lis pendens or to set bond as a petition for writ of certiorari, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), we deny the writ. We hold that the supplementary proceedings alleging fraudulent conveyance of property were predicated upon a recorded judgment and duly recorded deeds and that the failure to establish the necessity for bond under Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1981), or that lis pendens was inappropriate, precludes relief.
Petition for certiorari denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Edward SEINFELD, Eva Seinfeld, individually and as trustee of Barry Seinfeld, M.D., P.A., Barry Seinfeld, individually, Irving Shapiro, Barry Seinfeld, M.D., P.A., and Barry Seinfeld, M.D., P.A., Employees' Pension Trust v. COMMERCIAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published