The judgment under review, which was entered pursuant to our decision in Beecham v. Beecham, 407 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), is in complete accordance with that opinion and represents an unassailable exercise of the trial court’s discretion in the light of the record as supplemented by evidence taken after remand. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.