Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

State v. Williams

State v. Williams
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 3, 1984 · Jorgenson, Nesbitt, Pearson
447 So. 2d 1024; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12563 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, through counsel, concedes that the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s sworn motion to dismiss the information charging him with second degree grand theft. See State v. Pena-Salazar, 405 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Quarterman v. State, 401 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Following the confession of error the ap-pellee, through counsel, certified a conflict and moved to withdraw. This court took under advisement the motion to withdraw and granted the appellee an additional thirty days in which to file a supplemental brief, either personally or through counsel. No brief has been forthcoming.

We deny appellee’s motion to withdraw, reverse the trial court’s order dismissing the information charging Williams with second degree grand theft, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.