Wyant v. Battista
Wyant v. Battista
448 So. 2d 1122; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12590
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wyant v. Battista
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1980); Clayton v. Clayton, 442 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). It is not necessary for the court to rule on appellee’s motion for extension of time.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.