Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Hurst v. State

Hurst v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 27, 1984 · Campbell, Lehan, Over, Schoon
448 So. 2d 1250; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hurst v. State

Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellant has too many concurrent convictions to enumerate. We affirm the judgments of conviction against the appellant but remand for correction of appellant’s written sentences to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement as to the sentences running concurrently with “any active sentence being served.” See Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑