Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Tucker v. State

Tucker v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 4, 1984 · Campbell, Grimes, Lehan
449 So. 2d 406; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12889 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tucker v. State

Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 *407on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel, arguing on appeal that he was entitled to appointment of counsel for the hearing on his 3.850 motion. ‘ We affirm.

Defendant’s petition was insufficient to warrant a hearing under the criteria of Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla. 1981), and, therefore, defendant was not entitled to appointment of counsel. See Graham v. State, 372 So.2d 1363 (Fla. 1979).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.