Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Cikora v. State

Cikora v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 30, 1984 · Glickstein, Hurley, Walden
450 So. 2d 351; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cikora v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.

Affirmed.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.