Cikora v. State
Cikora v. State
450 So. 2d 351; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cikora v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.