Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

In re Estate of Keerl

In re Estate of Keerl
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 20, 1984 · Ahy, Dan, Grimes, Ryder
451 So. 2d 872; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11393 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

In re Estate of Keerl

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the personal representative an extension to file an objection to the claim, “even though the statutory time limit [had] expired prior to the filing of the motion for extension.” In re Estate of Sale, 227 So.2d 199, 201 (Fla. 1969); see also In re Estate of Oxford, 372 So.2d 1129, 1132 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.