Perez v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Perez v. State, 452 So. 2d 107 (1984)
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13927
Bart, Hub, Jorgenson, Schwartz

Perez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the trial court committed a technical error in admitting the hearsay testimony complained of on appeal, see Privett v. State, 417 So.2d 805, 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), (b) the said error, however, was harmless in the context of this case as the evidence of guilt was overwhelming and the cause was tried non-jury. See First Atlantic National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, 82 So.2d 870, 871-72 (Fla. 1955); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1983).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Aurelio PEREZ v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published