Hennington v. Cunningham
Hennington v. Cunningham
452 So. 2d 997; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hennington v. Cunningham
Opinion of the Court
The trial court's finding of an implied grant of easement will not be disturbed because it is supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We remand, however, with instructions to amend the final judgment to include a legal description of the easement. See Roy v. Euro-Holland Vastgoed, B.V., 404 So.2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.