Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Hennington v. Cunningham

Hennington v. Cunningham
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 19, 1984 · Ferguson, Hubbart, Pearson
452 So. 2d 997; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hennington v. Cunningham

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court's finding of an implied grant of easement will not be disturbed because it is supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We remand, however, with instructions to amend the final judgment to include a legal description of the easement. See Roy v. Euro-Holland Vastgoed, B.V., 404 So.2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.