Larouere v. Larouere
Larouere v. Larouere
453 So. 2d 516; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1702; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13961
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Larouere v. Larouere
Opinion of the Court
From the record before us, we hold that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion and he made a proper decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-1203 (Fla. 1980); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Although the marital property was distributed according to the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 400 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), it comports with that formula approved in Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1983).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.