Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Hall v. State

Hall v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 14, 1984 · Bark, Dull, Jorgenson, Schwartz
453 So. 2d 932; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1794; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14651 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hall v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s convictions of robbery and aggravated assault are affirmed. Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1983); Welty v. State, 402 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 1981); Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). However, the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences, pursuant to the provisions of Section 775.-087(2) Florida Statutes (1981), should have been ordered to be served concurrently. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Therefore the convictions are affirmed and the sentences are affirmed except as modified by this opinion to make the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences run concurrently rather than consecutively.

Affirmed as modified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.