Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sober

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sober, 455 So. 2d 1161 (1984)
9 Fla. L. Weekly 2096; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169
Ferguson, Hubbart, Nesbitt

Chase Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sober

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In view of this state’s policy of liberality toward setting aside defaults and allowing trials on the merits, see North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1962), we find that it was a gross abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny the appellant’s motion to vacate the default in the present case. The appellant presented a meritorious defense and sufficiently demonstrated excusable neglect by showing there was an inadvertent misfiling of the summons and complaint by a clerical employee. See Edwards v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 271 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1972); North Shore Hospital; Associated Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Imperatori, 338 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Accordingly, the order denying appellant’s motion to vacate default is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reference

Full Case Name
CHASE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. May SOBER and Jack Sober, her husband
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published