Affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellant incorrectly suggests in his motion for rehearing that this court held that a will could not be set aside on the basis of a nonbeneficiary’s exercise of undue influence. Rather, the rationale for our affirmance was based on a determination that appellant’s bare allegations of undue influence by a nonbeneficiary were insufficient to state grounds for relief.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.