Ross v. Hoppenheim
Ross v. Hoppenheim
458 So. 2d 93; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2319; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15750
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ross v. Hoppenheim
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s counterclaim. Although the counterclaim may be poorly drafted, and amendments may be necessary in order for appellant to set out a claim superior to that of appellees, we believe she has sufficiently set out a claim as to the personal property involved to require a responsive pleading and she should be allowed leave to amend her claim as to the real property involved.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accord herewith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.