Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

McKinney v. Wainwright

McKinney v. Wainwright
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 26, 1984 · Booth, Nimmons, Wigginton
458 So. 2d 1149; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2245; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15616 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

McKinney v. Wainwright

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

McKinney’s conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon was affirmed by this court in McKinney v. State, 428 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). In a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this court, he claims that his appellate *1150counsel was ineffective because of the failure to assert on appeal that the firearm should have been suppressed pursuant to Section 901.151(6), Florida Statutes (1981). However, even assuming that the facts of this case justified raising such issue, appellate counsel would have been precluded from doing so inasmuch as such defense was not asserted at trial. The petition is therefore Denied.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.