Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1984

Villa Sorrento, Inc. v. Elden

Villa Sorrento, Inc. v. Elden
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 7, 1984 · Barkett, Glickstein, Hurley
458 So. 2d 1177; 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2321; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15713 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Villa Sorrento, Inc. v. Elden

Opinion of the Court

BARKETT, Judge.

This appeal arises from an action between a cooperative association and a unit owner. The cooperative association prevailed on the merits. The lower court failed to award attorney’s fees in accordance with section 719.303, Florida Statutes (1983). We reverse.

Appellees suggest that the statutory language in question, “[t]he prevailing party is entitled to attorney’s fees,” is not mandatory. Appellee suggests that the trial courts have discretion to determine whether to award fees. We disagree. The statutory language is mandatory. The discretion of the trial court exists only to the extent of determining the reasonableness of the amount in light of the circumstances.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the assessment of a reasonable fee.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HURLEY, J., concurs. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

GLICKSTEIN, Judge,

specially concurring.

I hesitate to write because of concern for detracting from the majority opinion, in which I concur. Nevertheless, I add a thought that should be obvious to litigants; namely, that in resolving differences by way of settlement which the parties wish the trial court to ratify by order, litigants may agree that each party shall bear his own costs and attorney’s fees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.