State v. Prieto
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Ruiz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
- Taylor v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
- State v. Fernandez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
- State v. Parlier (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
- Moore v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
- Garbett v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Perez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Roberto PRIETO and Raul Nieves, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Howard Sohn, Miami, for appellee Raul Nieves.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals the trial court's determination that State v. Glosson, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1985), required dismissal of the criminal charges against defendants, Roberto Prieto and Raul Nieves. Dismissal of an information is not required under Glosson where, as here, payment to the confidential informant was contingent on the quantity of drugs seized and not on cooperation and trial testimony in the resulting criminal prosecution. We therefore hold that the trial court improperly dismissed the information. We reverse and remand as to both defendants.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.