Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1985

Hub Financial Corp. v. Olmetti

Hub Financial Corp. v. Olmetti
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 20, 1985 · Per Curiam
465 So. 2d 618; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 740 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hub Financial Corp. v. Olmetti

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

465 So.2d 618 (1985)

HUB FINANCIAL CORPORATION and Tony Varca, Appellants,
v.
Daniel OLMETTI and Olmetti Motors, Inc., Appellees.

Nos. 84-628, 84-2510.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 1985.

Edward R. Fink, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Steven S. Saber, Hollywood, for appellees.

*619 PER CURIAM.

We affirm in Appeal No. 84-2510 and reverse in Appeal No. 84-628. Permitting trial counsel to withdraw on the day of trial without granting a continuance to permit appellant to obtain new counsel was an abuse of discretion. This was especially egregious in the case of a corporation which cannot represent itself, but would be error in any event. See Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hardee County, 184 So.2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); Daytona Migi Corporation v. Daytona Automotive Fiberglass, Inc., 417 So.2d 272 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

We also note that neither Mark Varca nor Tony Varca have been properly served with process; therefore, they are not parties to this action and the trial court erred in entering judgment against them. However, inspection of the fourth amended complaint indicates that this point may be moot.

Appeal No. 84-2510. AFFIRMED.

Appeal No. 84-628. REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.